Build a Talented Team for Successful Business
Having a successful business is quite hard nowadays, mostly because there are a lot of other businesses that will be causing you problems by taking away potential customers from you. However, even with the competition, everyone can create a successful business that will do well and make you a lot of profit. The hardest part is to find the key to success, only a few people know what the key factors that are affecting the business are. One of those factors is actually the team of people that are working for you.
They are playing a very important role in the success of the business, and unfortunately, not many people understand that and they tend to ignore it. Now that you know this, you should pay a lot more attention to the people that you are hiring because they might decide the future of your business. Investing money into your business environment will make the workplace more desirable, therefore start improving the workplace. If you need extra money for that try using the trading app called HBSwiss.
If you do this right and you hire the right type of people, you will definitely increase your chances to succeed. The nice working environment should be more pleasing to people, therefore more people will be interested in working for you.
Beginning in 1970, Track and Field News annually published end-of-season collegiate team rankings based on dual meet competition. Womens teams were first ranked in 1979.
From their inception through 1993, the rankings were determined by correspondent John Wenos using a complex formula. TFN published Wenos top 20 or 25 teams (depending on the year), but he usually ranked 50 or more teams and made them available upon request. I would be very interested to obtain data from anyone who possesses any of Wenos full rankings.
As the importance of dual meet competition began to wane in the 1990s, the system began to change. Wenos only ranked ten teams in 1992 and 1993, and completely abandoned the rankings in 1994. Other ranking systems were attempted; for two years, the coaches themselves chose the rankings via a poll, but declining interest and some obviously biased ballots led to a quick demise. The USTFCCCA then picked up with a computer ranking system, but it had its drawbacks. Eventually, no rankings were kept.
Last year I reintroduced the dual meet rankings for TFN and will continue the practice for the foreseeable future. I will also attempt to reconstruct rankings from 1996 through 2011, and possibly seasons before 1970 as well.
The general rules for ranking were that a) teams had to compete in one or more dual meet, b) duals were defined as scored meets between four or fewer teams, and c) two-year institutions were not eligible for ranking. Rule c) was waived for the 1993 season, and I have chosen to leave those rankings intact. Rule a) was waived for the 1994 season, and I have chosen to retroactively enforce it and weed out noncompliant teams.